Migration
Rethinking Economic Integration: Mexico and Türkiye
Lessons from Migrant Pathways
Iconic landmarks and symbols of Mexico and Turkiye
© FNF MexicoWhy is it relevant?
This paper examines two of the most important migration corridors in the contemporary world: Latin America–United States and Middle East–Europe. Through the cases of Mexico and Türkiye, the study shows how migration reshapes labor markets, public policies, and social dynamics.
Its relevance lies in combining quantitative and qualitative evidence to explain how factors such as migration status, labor informality, financial access, and public perception affect the economic integration of migrants and refugees. It also provides concrete public policy recommendations for governments and international organizations.
Why should someone read it?
- Because it offers an uncommon comparison between Mexico and Türkiye, two countries that simultaneously function as origin, transit, and destination migration hubs.
- Because it explains how labor informality can become both a survival mechanism and a structural barrier to integration.
- Because it helps readers understand the relationship between migration, entrepreneurship, and economic development from a liberal and evidence-based perspective.
- Because it documents how migration externalization policies from the U.S. and the European Union directly impact receiving countries.
- Because it includes real testimonies and case studies of migrants in cities such as Tijuana, Tapachula, Mexico City, and Istanbul.